– About 12,900 years ago “something” caused a sudden climate change. Temperatures rapidly plummeted and returned to glacial conditions for about a 1,200 year long period.
Scientists now think they have found evidence what trigged rapid climate change and answer can be found in North America.
Prior to the Younger Dryas, the climate had gradually warmed from glacial conditions to near modern temperatures, and the massive ice sheets in North America were in full retreat. Then the climate changed and returned to glacial conditions for about a 1200 year long period. During this period, mammoths and mastodons became extinct in North America.
Scientists have released two papers that refute the hypothesis that one or more comets/bolides struck North America approximately 12,900 years ago triggering rapid climate change.
One is the report of elevated concentrations of nanometer-sized diamonds in sediments deposited at the onset of the Younger Dryas.
It is claimed that these diamonds were formed during an impact. The other is the interpretation that paleofire evidence at a key archaeological site demonstrates massive wildfires at the beginning of the Younger Dryas. It is claimed that the impact caused wildfires that spanned the continent.
Each paper shows that the evidence and interpretations supporting these two lines of arguments do not stack up. “Impact proponents report the rare form of diamond, lonsdaleite, that is usually associated with shock processing; however, we show that they misidentified polycrystalline aggregates of graphene and graphane as lonsdaleite,” said Dr. Tyrone Daulton, lead author of one of the papers.
“Further, we show that the nanodiamond concentration measurements reported by impact proponents are critically flawed. There is no evidence for a spike in the nanodiamond concentration at the onset of the Younger Dryas to suggest that an impact event occurred.”
Prof. Andrew Scott, lead author of the second paper said, “The idea of a Younger Dryas impact was an interesting one that has drawn much attention; however, increasingly methodological research over the past few years has failed to corroborate that story.
Our research has shown that many of the markers for such an event have been misinterpreted or misidentified.”